| Individual
Action, Organizational Clout:
An Interview with Peter Senge
by Vicky Schubert
from Leverage Points Issue 100
Copyright
© 2008 Pegasus Communications, Inc. (www.pegasuscom.com).
All rights reserved. No part of this article may
be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying
and recording, without written permission from Pegasus
Communications, Inc. If you wish to distribute copies
of this article, please contact our Permissions
Department at 781-398-9700 or permissions@pegasuscom.com.
PETER
SENGE is a senior lecturer at MIT and the founding
chair of SoL, the Society for Organizational Learning.
His latest book, The Necessary Revolution: How
Individuals and Organizations are Working Together
to Create a Sustainable World, co-authored
with Bryan Smith, Nina Kruschwitz, Joe Laur, and
Sara Schley, draws from their work over the past
decade with the SoL Sustainability Consortium and
related collaborative efforts to offer stories and
tools for practitioners seeking to transform the
way their organizations do business. Peter recently
spoke with Leverage
Points about the relationship between organizational
change and individual action.
With
the publication of his latest book, The Necessary
Revolution, Peter Senge and his coauthors have
taken another step in galvanizing a movement of individuals
who understand that their greatest leverage for transforming
society lies through organizations. As many of us
are already taking action in our personal lives to
reduce waste through our consumer choices and new
behaviors, it becomes increasingly apparent that
it’s our organizations—particularly interconnected
webs of organizations, business partnerships, supply
chains, even whole industries—that have the
greatest clout.
Senge
believes that organizations represent a blind spot
in the sustainability field, which has focused
more on individual and government action, when
neither has the broad-reaching influence that organizational
action has. “For the most part,” he
explains, “it isn’t government policy
that’s destroying species, and certainly
you or I couldn’t destroy a species if we
tried. But we succeed in doing just that by the
way our individual decisions are mediated through
the webs of institutions that define the global
economy.” The key, then, lies in transforming
the Industrial Age economic system by adopting
more sustainable ways of doing business, individually
and collectively.
A
daunting task, to be sure. But Peter is convinced
that this shift is already starting to happen and
that each of us has a role to play. He suggests
that we start by asking, “What are some of
the things my organization could be doing? What
are ways in which I could become a more effective
instigator and leader of these changes?” Peter
points out that there is often an obvious business
case to be made—particularly as energy costs
rise—for redesigning a process or making
an operational change that saves enough money to
matter. It could be as mundane as installing light
switches that automatically go off if nobody is
in a room, or agreeing to adopt the practice of
turning off the light in the bathroom when you
leave it, or striving to move toward a “zero
waste” office environment where everything
is reused or recycled. A funny thing happens when
you start talking with each other about making
these kinds of simple changes in your workplace:
You build a sense of shared vision.
Senge
points out, “Building a shared vision
in an organization is not about everybody saluting
the wall where the vision statement is posted. It’s
about people doing things together that they care
about. It doesn’t matter if it’s mundane.
All of a sudden you realize, ‘Hey, we’re
doing this together.’” Beyond the economic
benefits, these moves can become a source of fun
and constitute one of the more effective ways to
unite people around a common goal. He continues, “In
many parts of Vermont, you pay to have your trash
picked up, but recycling is free—think about
what that does to get people working together to
reduce waste.” These preliminary steps also
start to build a common awareness for the major changes
coming: new products, new processes, new business
models, and wholly new networks of collaboration.
The
Courage to Step Outside the Bubble
Senge believes that most of the industrialized
world is living in a bubble of denial about the
precariousness of our wasteful “take-make-waste” culture
where rich countries increasingly impose the
side effects of their lifestyles on poorer ones
through global food, energy, and material goods
systems. “For virtually all other species,” he
says, “food is local, energy comes from
the sun (in many forms), and ‘waste equals
food;’ that is, by-products of one living
system are nutrients for another.” The
Industrial Age has fostered a kind of collective
hypnosis that our food can be shipped thousands
of miles, energy comes from digging up and burning
former living systems, and waste is someone else’s
problem. The stresses created by this way of
living, manifesting in problems such as soaring
gas prices, climate change, and social instability,
are finally getting everyone’s attention.
The question is whether we can move beyond just
reacting to these crises to thinking and acting
in ways that will create new systems that are
regenerative rather than exploitative.
The
problems with changing the status quo can seem
so daunting that it is hard to see what anyone
can do, yet The Necessary Revolution is
full of stories of people whose passion and courage
to pursue a more systemic perspective have enabled
them to build networks and foster innovations that
have snowballed. For example, ten years ago, Darcy
Winslow headed a small advanced materials group
at Nike that worked with Cradle to Cradle authors
Bill McDonough and Michael Braungart to do a toxicological
study of Nike’s entire footwear line. The
results were shocking; the company had no idea
of the number of toxins in the shoes. Case in point:
the “air” in the Nike Air shoe—a
bestseller that was considered one of their biggest
design successes—was a substance called SF6,
which was a much longer-lived greenhouse gas than
carbon dioxide. Likewise, glues and solvents used
in the manufacturing process posed serious health
problems for workers and potentially for communities
when shoes were eventually discarded. The company,
which prides itself on health and fitness, faced
a huge predicament.
Darcy
couldn’t solve the problem overnight, so
she started talking to people. Having just read
Malcolm Gladwell’s The Tipping Point,
she figured if she could get 3 to 5 percent of
Nike employees to align with her, something could
really start to change. But when she calculated
that, given the size of the company, she’d
need to enlist something like 1,000 supporters,
she had to admit that probably wasn’t going
to happen.
Then
she realized that she didn’t have to reach
everyone. Instead, she concentrated on Nike’s
few hundred lead designers, some of the most influential
people shaping Nike’s products. Now, reaching
5 percent seemed a lot less daunting. Once she
started knocking on doors, she found many who were
interested in the problems but had been turned
off by how the problems had been presented. Senge
recounts, “Creative people don’t get
excited by being told, ‘We’ve got to
get all of this bad stuff out of our shoes.’ What
excites them is the challenge, ‘What would
it take to create a shoe with zero toxins?’” Nobody
had ever done anything like that before. Gradually,
Darcy succeeded in connecting to what the authors
of the book call, “the generative DNA of
a company,” and things started to change.
In
the ensuing years, Nike introduced a whole line
of organic cotton products (creating the Organic
Cotton Exchange to bring more organic cotton to market
worldwide), created the “Reuse-a-Shoe” program
to recycle old sneakers into running tracks, and
introduced many products with greatly reduced waste
and toxicity. Today, they have a new system for rating
all products on the basis of waste, toxicity, water,
and energy used in their production. Not just shoes,
but every product receives a sustainability rating:
Gold Medal, Silver Medal, Bronze Medal, or no Medal.
For example, Michael Jordan’s new Air Jordan
shoe will be one of Nike’s first Gold Medal
basketball shoes, with a woven upper that creates
almost no waste in production and a sole that is
stitched to avoid all glues and solvents. Plus, after
many years of research to find polymers that could
keep air from leaking out of the shoe, the “air” is
now actual air and not SF6. The company is sufficiently
convinced that these ideas will shape future markets
that they are now striving to achieve zero waste
and zero toxicity across their entire product line
by 2020.
For
Peter, the human side of the story is always the most
memorable. “I was touched,” he
says, “when, at the recent Sustainability
Consortium meeting where we learned about the new product
rating system, all of the presentations were done by
the people whom Darcy and her long-time colleague Sarah
Severn had mentored, a new generation of leaders—interestingly,
mostly women—who are now leading what they call
their ‘Considered’ projects. The label
stems from the question each project is designed to
answer: “Have you considered how much
water, or waste, or energy is in this product?”
The
Natural Order of Things
In addition to personal courage, leaders of organizational
change like Darcy Winslow need reliable models around
which to build their vision of more sustainable practices.
Fortunately, such models abound in the natural world,
where sustainable design principles such as localness,
diversity, and ‘waste equals food’ have
been trial tested over the last billion years or so.
We exhale carbon dioxide, so we’re surrounded
by vegetation that eats up carbon dioxide. Everything
in nature is continually co-evolving—which is
exactly what will start to happen when we move beyond
mere mechanical models for our organizations and societies. “Zero
waste is a pretty challenging principle for organizations,” says
Senge, “but, for innovators, it opens up a vast
territory that you can start to explore one step at
a time as you build up networks of collaborators.”
Peter
shares the story of Per Carstedt, a Swedish entrepreneur
who has led the so-called “bio-region movement” in
northern Sweden, in which communities are working
together to become the world’s first advanced
industrial society with zero reliance on fossil
fuels. Fifteen years ago, Carstedt and a few other
people started introducing modified Ford Tauruses
that could run on ethanol. Today, 25 percent of
all vehicles sold in Sweden are capable of running
completely on ethanol.
Along
the way, Carstedt, himself a car dealer, began
to focus beyond the transportation system—which
produces only about 25 percent of greenhouse gases—to
the built environment, where heating, air conditioning,
and electrical equipment account for about 50 percent.
Around 2001, he and colleagues created the “Green
Zone”—a trio of interdependent businesses
that includes a McDonalds, a service station, and
a car dealership. The service station sells ethanol
made from the waste oil in the McDonalds. The car
dealership has no heating system of its own, but
is heated by waste heat that comes from McDonalds.
And, of course, the car dealership sells ethanol-fueled
vehicles and promotes sustainable production of
ethanol (the region is building state-of-the art
facilities that convert forest waste products,
not food crops, into abundant supply).
As Senge recounts, Carstedt is amazed by the
attention the experiment has gotten. He had felt
it was almost trivial, being on such a small
scale. But by the time he conducted his 500th
tour of the Green Zone, this time with a group
from Japan that was filming it for a television
show, he had come to realize the power in creating
something tangible that everybody can relate
to. Peter notes, “Everybody knows McDonalds,
everybody knows a gas station, and everybody
knows a car dealership. These were just regular
people with regular small businesses—not
IBM or Microsoft—just small businesspeople
who said, ‘Hey, let’s find a way
to dramatically reduce our total waste and switch
to sustainable energy.’”
According
to Senge, this combination of pragmatism, humility,
and vision is key. Like the Industrial Revolution,
the revolution needed today will not “come
from any grand plan or government agency, because
the issues are too deep and the changes too sweeping.” It
will take all of us—business, education,
civil society organizations, and government and
public sector leadership—to tackle the immense
challenges we face.
Suggestions
for further reading:
The
Necessary Revolution: How Individuals and Organizations
are Working Together to Create a Sustainable
World,
by Peter Senge, Bryan Smith, Nina Kruschwitz, Joe
Laur, and Sara Schley
(Doubleday
Currency, 2008)
|