The
Power of Stories to Convey Meaning in the Workplace: An
Interview with David Hutchens
by Kali Saposnick
Copyright
© 2001 Pegasus Communications, Inc. (www.pegasuscom.com).
All rights reserved. No part of this newsletter may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording,
without written permission from Pegasus Communications,
Inc. If you wish to distribute copies of this article,
please contact our Permissions Department at 781-398-9700
or permissions@pegasuscom.com.
In
the following interview, David Hutchens, author of the
Learning Fables series published by Pegasus Communications,
shares why he thinks storytelling is such a powerful
medium to communicate ideas and create collective meaning.
He also illustrates how managers can use his four books
to create new awareness and initiate a rich discussion
of organizational learning principles with their staff.
Leverage
Points: Why do stories appeal to such a wide cross-
section of readers?
David
Hutchens: Cognitive science explains that most people
think relationally, that is, they grasp information
by how it relates to other informationin the same
way that stories are structured. A story's plot illustrates
how theory looks when practiced in real life. For instance,
rather than trying to convey the concept of mental models
by abstractly walking you through the Ladder of Inference
tool, Shadows of the Neanderthal shows how two
fictional clans of cave people developed different assumptions
about how the world works.
Often
in business contexts, people converse in ways theywould
never do in more natural social environments. For instance,
at home, my wife and I tell stories to each other about
our day; it's our default mode of communication. I'm
the same person when I go to work the next morning,
yet it's hard to respond spontaneously to the jargon-filled
business communications that come across my desk. How
many of us really think in bullet points?
LP:
Why are stories so powerful in creating shared meaning
and generating organizational change?
DH:
I really like how Stephen Denning explains this in his
book The Springboard: How Storytelling Ignites Action
in Knowledge-Era Organizations (Butterworth-Heinemann,
2000). A former executive with the World Bank, Denning
was instrumental in making knowledge management a key
initiative there, back when KM was a new and emerging
concept. In the book, he shares how he'd promoted KM
for a long time, but nobody really got what he was talking
about. Then one day at a large meeting, he said, "Let
me tell you a story about a small health clinic in Zambia,
one of the world's most underdeveloped countries."
He described how doctors had cured malaria in their
village by using their computer to get treatment information
from the U.S. Center for Disease Control's web site.
"That's knowledge management," he concluded,
and for the first time, everyone got excited. They recognized
how urgently their organization needed that capability,
and many even acted as if KM was their idea.
People
can own the ideas from a story quickly because a story
connects us with our unique set of perceptions and emotions,
validating and enriching what we already know. Denning
describes this process as lighting a fuseand you
don't know how it's going to go off in each person.
I call it opening "the black box of meaning"
inside of us. A story helps me lift the lid off that
box and connect to my own inner experiences at a very
deep level.
Storytelling
triggers the mind to ask questions and explore what's
going on. When we communicate with bullet points and
models, people usually become evaluative and critical,
asking questions such as "Is this true?" or
"How does this apply to me?" With stories,
they're more receptive. Why? Because they can't say,
"Oh, that didn't happen." Of course it did,
it's my story. So they open up and their judging goes
away. They become engaged with the narrative and make
connections. When reading The Lemming Dilemma,
people don't think, well, technically, our organization
is not going through the same situation as the lemmings,
that is, we're not all jumping off cliffs and dying.
But they relate to the concept of taking irrational
actions without thinking about the consequences.
LP:
Would you recommend that all leaders use storytelling
when training their staff?
DH:
Yes, but with the awareness that storytelling can be
dangerous, because you can't control what people do
with a story. Stories might not be effective when managers
need their employees to accurately understand specific
data, for example, how to use a software program. In
that instance, it makes sense to communicate in a straightforward,
linear style. But sharing information through stories
is messier, because the message is not as direct and
people make connections that you might not have intended.
This process can be powerful when you want to generate
innovation and creativity; even better, people become
personally invested in the communication so you don't
have to convince them to embrace it.
With
the Learning Fables, trainers have options for how they
choose to present the material. Depending on their objectives,
they can use the end matter to help staff connect the
story's metaphors to the body of business theory they're
trying to convey. Or they might want people to associate
freely and develop divergent points of view, so they
ask participants not to read the end matter, just the
story. Many people find that the new terminology and
models stemming from the plot help them make sense of
their learning experience. The Tip of the Iceberg
end matter, for instance, helps you understand why the
penguin-walrus collaboration represents a limits-to-growth
cycle. By connecting experiences with new tools and
language, you can be much more purposeful about thinking
and acting systemically.
LP:
How have readers responded to the Learning Fables?
DH:
When I first began writing the series, I wasn't sure
what people would think about talking animals, cartoon
illustrations, and absurd humor. But readers enjoy the
game-like element of the stories as they try to grasp
abstract organizational theory. For example, in my first
book, Outlearning the Wolves, the disappearance
of the main character, Otto the sheep, early in the
story is handled ambiguously. When I'm in sessions with
work groups, having serious conversations about how
an organization learns, somebody often asks, "Is
Otto really dead?" A colleague will add, "Well,
the story never really says. I think he's still alive,"
and the group starts musing about Otto's fate. So in
response, in each of my subsequent books, Otto mysteriously
appears in an illustration, and people look for him.
It's another example of how people personally invest
themselves in the narrative.
|