| Systems
Thinking Hits Its Stride: An Interview with Michael
Goodman
by Kali Saposnick
from Leverage Points Issue 42
Copyright
© 2003 Pegasus Communications, Inc. (www.pegasuscom.com).
All rights reserved. No part of this article may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and
recording, without written permission from Pegasus
Communications, Inc. If you wish to distribute copies
of this article, please contact our Permissions Department
at 781-398-9700 or permissions@pegasuscom.com.
Michael
Goodman, principal of Innovation Associates Organizational
Learning, has developed and conducted systems thinking
programs around the world. Having attended and presented
at every Pegasus Conference since its inception in
1991, Michael will continue the tradition at this
year's conference in October in Boston by co-facilitating
the "Designing a Systems Thinking Intervention" learning
path. In these sessions, he will help participants
apply systems tools to understanding and solving a
chronic problem in their organization. In the following
interview, Michael shares some thoughts about how
systems thinking has shifted over the years and why
its application is relevant today.
In
the late 1950s, a brilliant electrical engineer at
the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) pioneered
the use of computer simulation to address business
and organizational issues. Jay Forrester, the founder
of the field of system dynamics, challenged business
and world leaders to use these tools to consider the
long-term, unintended consequences of their policies
and actions. Inspired by the potential of systems
thinking to contribute to a better world, the students
in Jay's courses built upon his insights and branched
out into many fields. One of those MIT graduates,
Michael Goodman, found his niche developing and applying
systems thinking in the area of organization change
and learning.
"The key question my peers and I continually asked
ourselves was, 'How can we make systems thinking available
to a wider audience?'" says Michael. "The sense of
urgency in organizations to fix problems quickly has
led people to take short-sighted actions, resulting
in unintended, adverse, and sometimes devastating
effects. We wanted to figure out 'How can we get the
greatest number of people to think things through
thoroughly before they make far-reaching decisions?
How can we help them test their assumptions and beliefs
so they can identify the unintended effects of their
strategies and dig deeper for new, long-lasting solutions
to old problems?'"
Increased Accessibility
Answers to these questions began to emerge over the
past three decades, as innovative breakthroughs in
software, tools, and literature made systems thinking
accessible to an increasing number of people. On the
simulation modeling front, Michael points to less
technical, more user-friendly computer programs, such
as ithinkŪ, developed by the late Barry Richmond
of High Performance Systems, and VensimŪ, developed
by Bob Eberlein of Ventana Systems, that have enabled
more people to create simulations of and, in turn,
better understand complex problems in their organizations.
On the organizational front, the identification of
systems archetypes, to which Michael made significant
contributions, has helped people easily recognize
common systemic patterns in the workplace. The systems
archetypes illuminate familiar, recurring stories
that apply to organizations across the board; for
example, "Fixes That Backfire or Fail" shows the consequences
of short-sighted decision-making, and "Limits to Success"
explains the barriers to growing an enterprise or
improving performance.
Goodman and his colleagues have tried to make systems
thinking accessible by positioning it as "a common
language for thinking and acting that makes it easier
for people to have conversations about things that
matter." Like any language, he says, you've got to
practice it. To become fluent, you must immerse yourself
in it and keep working at it until you begin thinking
in that language. As you begin to think systemically,
you instinctively start to broaden your perspective
and consider the unintended consequences of your organization's
decisions and policies.
According to Michael, Peter Senge's The Fifth Discipline
has played an enormous role in helping people
become aware of the value of learning this language.
He explains: "Peter's articulation of the five disciplines-systems
thinking, mental models, shared vision, team learning,
and personal mastery-captured people's passion and
excitement. My colleagues and I were delighted by
the idea of a 'learning organization' that could improve
its competitive advantage by integrating these principles
into the fabric of the workplace." One powerful
outcome of the book, he notes, is that more people
than ever before are using systems thinking to surface
and test their beliefs and assumptions about how the
world works. "Our mental models shape how we behave
and how our organizations function. Once we can see
undesirable patterns we've created in our organizations,
we can start to change them. We're no longer prisoners
of them."
Three Trends
What's been particularly exciting to Michael is the
ways in which organizations have made shifts in their
culture by applying a systemic perspective. Over the
last few decades, he has seen the following trends:
1) expanding internal capacity to use systems thinking
in organizations, 2) greater global awareness of systems
thinking language, 3) and greater application of systems
thinking in the public sector where policies are formed.
Expanding Internal Capacity. More organizations
are investing in developing their own internal capacity
to integrate systems thinking into how they do their
work. For example, four years ago, Goodman was invited
to help mid-level and upper managers develop their
skills in the areas of leadership, team alignment,
mental models, shared vision, and systems thinking
at one of the largest oil producers in the world.
Several far-sighted executives wanted to promote shifts
within the company so that it could respond agilely
to pressing environmental, political, and economic
issues related to oil and its future. A visible outcome
of this initiative is that the organization has now
developed a cadre of internal change agents with advanced
skills in systems thinking and the confidence to champion
the tool as a way for the organization to effectively
address its business challenges.
Michael explains, "Middle and upper management have
begun to shift from trying to supply all the answers
to tapping into the intelligence and experience of
an entire team to solve difficult problems. They have
pioneered ways to build informal communities of practice
across functional boundaries that use systems thinking
as the primary vehicle for meaningful conversations
around ongoing and new challenges." He points to one
engineering community of practice that meets regularly
to discuss the problems of corrosion, or the inevitable
degradation of the metal in the pipelines. During
the course of their dialogues, participants have pulled
together new knowledge, identified potentially high-leverage
actions and interventions, and made recommendations
that they're now implementing. Without the language
and tools of systems thinking, they would not have
made such progress.
Greater Global Awareness. Today, more
employees in organizations around the globe are familiar
with systems thinking language than ever before. "People
may not be using systems tools per se, but they recognize
the value of the ideas," Michael says. "In my travels
to Malaysia, Korea, Australia, Saudi Arabia, India,
and South Africa, I find that virtually any manager
I meet has heard of 'learning organizations' or 'mental
models.' I've watched people pause a little more rather
than instantly react to problems or crises. With this
body of material to help them process information
in ways they hadn't before, they seem to have 'permission'
to say, wait a minute, we need to go slower now in
order for us to go faster later."
Michael notes that systems thinking, as well as the
other disciplines, is showing up more frequently in
management and organization literature. He cites Applying
Quality Management in Healthcare: A Process for Improvement
by Diane L. Kelly (Health Administration Press,
2003), which provides an integrated approach to tackling
the quality challenges inherent in healthcare, and
Viable Business Strategies: A Systemic, People-Centric
Approach by Marius Ungerer, Maurits Pretorius,
and Johan Herholdt (Knowres Publishing, 2002), which
outlines a systemic framework for developing and implementing
strategy.
Greater Application in Public Institutions.
A third significant trend is the growing use
of systems thinking in the public sector. For example,
several Singaporean agencies, including the police
force, military, and education ministry, have made
a long-term commitment to bringing organizational
learning and systems thinking to their policy-making
processes. Also, the U.S. Navy has made significant
investments in an internal e-learning network to make
systems thinking accessible to its entire workforce;
a sailor on a ship at sea can now tap into a web-based
course on systems thinking.
A Natural Part of Doing Things
"Basically what's happened over the past decade or
so is that we've learned, and are continuously learning,
a lot about how systems thinking works best, where
its strengths are, how to connect people naturally
with it, and how to get it to take hold in an organization."
Michael says. "With these discoveries, I'm expecting
more organizations than ever to build it into their
way of working. Systems thinking is more than drawing
loops or using the archetypes. It's about shifting
how we think and act. By bringing both the short-
and long-term dimensions into our conversation, asking
different kinds of questions, and making our assumptions
visible, we are better able to tap into the intelligence
and wisdom within our organizations and, ultimately,
improve the quality of our decisions and performance."
Kali Saposnick is publications editor at Pegasus Communications.
|