|
Systems
Stories
Building
Community Through "Healthy Chaos": An Interview
with Steven Bingler
by Kali Saposnick
from THE SYSTEMS THINKER® Volume 12, Number 4
Copyright
© 2001 Pegasus Communications, Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this newsletter may be reproduced or transmitted
in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including
photocopying and recording, without written permission from
Pegasus Communications, Inc. If you wish to distribute copies
of this article, please contact our Permissions Department
at 781-398-9700 or permissions@pegasuscom.com.
View the article in PDF
Imagine
you own a candy store on Main Street and need someone to develop
your web site. Whom do you turn to for help? In the 7,000-person
town of Littleton, NH, the owner relinquished his store’s
basement to the high school economics program in exchange
for the students’ computer services. As a result, the school
was able to use its then-empty classroom to house a NASA-sponsored
geographic information systems program. That complex, yet
simple, exchange exemplifies the kinds of connections that
architect Steven Bingler encourages community members to
make.
Authentic Economics
“It’s authentic economics,” says Bingler, founder of Concordia,
an award-winning planning and architectural design firm based
in New Orleans, LA. In approaching the design of a new public
building, the firm engages the whole community in systemically
analyzing their resources, raising awareness of otherwise
hidden issues, and engendering solutions that meet the needs
of diverse constituencies. In particular, Bingler wants to
center communities around their schools and vice versa. About
the Littleton scenario, he says, “If you can locate a class
of 60 students during the day on Main Street, then you can
create $100,000 worth of value back at the school site in
the form of an empty classroom.” The basement redesign, supervised
by the town’s fire marshal, “took only two months, with the
community raising $500 and donating services to build that
basement out.”
How does Bingler assure that all voices are heard during the
design phase? “We have a two-month process to get the right
people at the table,” he says.The planning team’s initial
task is to identify individuals from every constituency in
the community. If a stakeholder group is not initially represented,
“We go get them and bring them in,” Bingler reports. Because
of this commitment, a Los Angeles project required simultaneous
translation in three languages. In Michigan, a project steering
committee included 170 people because the community didn’t
feel that 100 participants could adequately represent all
constituencies.
The representatives then identify the community’s assets in
six areas—physical, social, educational, cultural, economic,
and organizational—and learn how to hook them together. When
citizens, teachers, shop owners, students, and others work
together to integrate these assets in innovative new ways,
they reinvent the concept of community. “It’s the same kind
of participatory team-based planning ideas that have been
developed through corporate structures in the last 30 years,”
Bingler comments.
Local participants do most of the legwork to locate the community’s
resources. At their monthly meetings, connections abound:
For instance, the Littleton town manager realized that the
sewer treatment plant, which the state uses just twice a year,
could accommodate a full-fledged science lab. Others envisioned
developing an environmental academy; when the local college
heard about the idea, they expressed interest in funding some
of the curriculum development.“It’s about controlled, healthy
chaos,” comments the cutting-edge architect. “In the end,
it’s about relationships between people, places, and things,
and constantly evaluating the best way of maximizing those
relationships.”
Community
as School, School as Community
Bingler imagines that, in the extreme, there would be
no school building: the whole community would be the school
and the school the whole community. “Learning is an integrated
part of life, not something isolated at some school site with
a chain-link fence around it,” he says. Naturally, students
love the idea. In this process, they’re treated with enormous
respect and are deeply involved in developing and implementing
ideas.
Another important outcome of this work, he adds, is the way
it revitalizes democratic practices in local areas. This
approach to planning empowers people; instead of relying on
others, they do things for themselves. Soon they realize that
the process is as important as the product. Democratic decision-making
is something that most people can understand and agree with.
But many local governments have lost their communities’ trust
because they establish policies that lack congruence. As communities
engage in designing well-integrated systems that respond to
diverse constituencies, they are simultaneously taking back
the reins of governance.
Bingler favors keeping things simple. “And complexity can
be made simpler,” he insists. “Large groups of people are
capable of being enormously creative together.”They can handle
complexity as long as they achieve some degree of harmony.
“And you create harmony,” Bingler says, “through the process
of involving an entire community—it’s hard work and then all
of a sudden it turns into fun.”
Kali Saposnick is publications editor at Pegasus Communications.
|