At
Any Rate
by
Chris Soderquist and Bill Harris
Model 3,
February 2002
When Smallpox Becomes a Threat Again
One
of the legacies of September 11 is a heightened awareness
of the fragility of human life and our susceptibility
to bioterrorism. Smallpox, declared eradicated over
20 years ago, is in the news again, forcing policymakers
to make many difficult decisions. Should they restart
the vaccinations that were part of everyone's life decades
ago? Should they focus on stockpiling vaccines? Should
they rely on quarantines? How should we as citizens
evaluate what the government and health officials decide?
We
believe systems thinking can offer insight into these
questions to those people responsible for dealing with
such horrific events as a smallpox outbreak. We've developed
a model structure that generates the behavior experienced
in an epidemic. This model can help us to determine
policies that might impact outcomes as well as describe
potential consequences, both intended and unintended,
of these policies. It also allows us to explore the
issue publicly, and to articulate, test, and debate
different opinions and assumptions clearly. Such an
approach won't give the answer, but it can provide
structure to a forum that seeks to improve confidence
in policy decisions.
Let's see how systems thinking might assist government
and public health officials in dealing effectively with
a smallpox epidemic and help citizens evaluate the work
of their government. We'll start, as we often do, by
describing the behavior we're trying to understand:
What's the basic characteristic of an epidemic? Many
people getting sick very suddenly. It starts out with
one or two victims, then the number escalates rapidly.
After a while, the epidemic runs its course, and the
incidence of illness subsides almost as quickly as it
rose. The pattern of people with the disease looks like
the graph below.
.
Next,
let's create a hypothesis about the nature of a structure
that can generate the behavior shown in the graph. First,
it has a stock of sick people. Because these
people started out as healthy, we'll consider healthy
people a stock, too. (Remember, stocks are accumulations-they're
like bathtubs to which water is added or taken away.
They are shown as rectangles in our model diagram).
We'll consider the number of people becoming infected
per day as a flow between the stocks of healthy
people and sick people. (Flows are what cause the stock
to change; they add and take away what's in the stock.
They are shown as pipes with valves.)
We
know, of course, that people don't stay sick forever.
Something happens: either they eventually recover or,
unfortunately for some, they die. If they recover, they
are typically immune from further contracting of that
disease. The four main stocks in our model-healthy people,
sick people, recovered people, and deceased people-and
the three flows connecting them describe how people
"move" through an epidemic. By including these
variables, we have made the model complete enough to
recreate the evolution of an epidemic-in this case,
the rapid increase in small pox occurrence, followed
by a later, rapid decline in occurrence.

How might we use such a model to test strategies for
dealing with an epidemic? Public health and government
officials, who must decide how to prepare for the eventuality
of bioterrorism attacks, can use such a model:
To compare the effectiveness of immunization and quarantine
programs and determine how good such programs would
have to be.
To evaluate if either program alone is sufficient
to address the epidemic or if both are needed.
To explore possible adverse consequences of vaccinations.
To share their decisions with the public to improve
people's understanding of their recommendations, thus
creating more public support (assuming their policies
appear good!).
Below
we describe two possible public policies, one based
on quarantines, the other immunizations, which the model
can test for efficacy.
Policy
1: Quarantines
Perhaps the oldest approach to dealing with highly infectious
diseases, a quarantine involves segregating those who
are infectious from the rest of the population. In the
case of a smallpox attack, public health systems would
likely be called into action the moment a case was identified.
As people were diagnosed with the disease, they and
other people they may have infected would be isolated.
Unfortunately, in most cases people would become infectious
at the same time that they began to exhibit symptoms,
and thus they'd have potentially contacted a few others
before they were isolated. Quarantines, if conducted
too aggressively and without sufficient reason, can
generate legal challenges.
We've
designed the downloadable model to initiate quarantines
after an outbreak has been detected. The user can define
how long it takes to initiate a quarantine and how effective
it is. The model indicates that a quarantine must be
highly effective to have a significant impact. At a
50 percent effectiveness rate, the primary effect of
the quarantine is to slow the growth of the disease.
The total number deceased doesn't change much, at least
in the six-month time horizon of the model. As the quarantine
improves to filter out more than 90 percent of infected
people, the number who die in the first six months declines
markedly.
Policy
2: Immunizations
Immunizations involve preventing the disease from occurring,
rather than stopping its spread, but a vaccine must
exist, and it must be available in sufficient quantity.
The vaccine also has a risk of side effects, which can
include death.
Similar
to quarantines, the model simulates an immunization
program by sensing an outbreak of smallpox, waiting
for the delay in starting the vaccination program, and
then reducing healthy people's susceptibility to the
disease. The user can vary the time to initiate immunizations
and vary the effectiveness of that immunization program.
Since an immunization program prevents people from catching
the disease, while the quarantine inhibits its further
spread, a good immunization program has advantages over
a good quarantine.
The
individual results for quarantines and immunizations
suggest that a combination strategy would be effective:
quarantine people immediately to slow the epidemic,
and vaccinate those likely to come in contact with known
infected people as quickly as you can. While our model
doesn't simulate this combined approach, if you have
a copy of ithink® or STELLA® software,
you can modify the model to combine quarantines and
immunizations.
We
invite you to download the model now to learn more about
how epidemics might evolve and the possible results
of quarantine and immunization policies. Think about
some of the assumptions we didn't model. What do you
like in the model? What do you think should be changed?
Let us know your thoughts in the Pegasus
forum. We realize that public health officials
would need to develop and test the model more thoroughly
before using it to set public policy. Our goal in designing
it was to illuminate how systems thinking can improve
the richness and rigor of discussions concerning possible
approaches to a bioterrorism attack.
The
smallpox model was created in collaboration with Turning
Point's National Program Office, which is funded by
the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

Using
the Model
To use the model, you'll need to download two filesthe
"current model" and the "isee Player"
(the ithink® Runtime for the At Any Rate
model series) that runs the model. Both are located
in the "Get" section toward the top of
the right-hand column. You'll then need to install
the isee Player on your computer. (Once you have
installed the isee Player on your computer, you
no longer have to go through this process unless
the reader is updated.)
1)
Download the "Current Model"
Click "Current Model."
Choose "Save this file to a disk"
and click "okay."
In "Save As," save the ITR file
to your desktop (or to a folder of your choosing).
2)
Download and install the "isee Player"
Follow the instructions on the isee Systems
site.
After
you install the isee Player, to run the model, you
can go to your desktop and double-click on "model1.itr"
or start the ithink® program and use
the "file open" command to locate and
open the model1.itr file.
You are ready to begin. Feel free to play with the
model. We've put more content in it than we've described
in this column. Try different things. If you've
got an interesting idea, a question, or a comment,
go to our Pegasus
Forum. We'd enjoy hearing from you.

This
learning lab was developed using the ithink®
software, a computer simulation modeling
package developed and distributed by isee Systems.
|